Electromotive drug administration of lidocaine as an alternative anesthesia for transurethral surgery.

PURPOSE A multicenter study was undertaken to evaluate the safety, efficacy and cost of electromotive drug administration of intravesical lidocaine to produce bladder local anesthesia as an alternative to traditional methods of spinal or general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 94 patients were enrolled in the study who had either a history of bladder tumor that required cold cup bladder biopsy with fulguration for possible recurrence as a comparison trial, a bladder tumor treated with transurethral resection/fulguration or benign prostatic hyperplasia/carcinoma treated with transurethral resection. Pain scores using a Verbal Rating Scale were recorded for each individual biopsy, fulguration and resection event. Data for direct and indirect costs were collected using a standardized form for each patient to capture the details of the procedure, including times, drugs and disposables for each patient. RESULTS There was a significant reduction in pain for patients who received electromotive intravesical lidocaine compared to no anesthesia for biopsy (p<0.03). Similarly, electromotive intravesical lidocaine for bladder biopsy and transurethral bladder tumor resection/fulguration was associated with higher patient satisfaction compared to previous treatments (p<0.00002). In contrast, electromotive intravesical lidocaine was insufficient for 3 of 6 transurethral prostatic resections. The cost per patient was about $146 Cdn less with electromotive intravesical lidocaine than with conventional general/spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS Electromotive intravesical lidocaine may be a safe, effective and affordable form of anesthesia for the ambulatory care of patients requiring transurethral bladder biopsy, resection or fulguration with a potential for cost savings.